Start live chat with our team?
Call Now (414) 453-0800
Stars
David Iancu and his staff are top notch professionals. I would recommend David Iancu to anyone who is going through a divorce.
Harmony R.
David is a great listener and very sharp. Most of all, he knows the law and examines every opportunity to defend his client.
Talyia C.
I can't say enough about David's attentive demeanor through the highs and lows associated with complex divorce issues.
Laurence S.
contact us Free & Confidential Consultation
The results you need.

Manufacturer Defenses in Automotive Products Liability Cases

 

The basic elements of proof that a plaintiff has to establish in a products liability action against the manufacturer or seller of a motor vehicle are that the vehicle as sold contained a defect that created an unreasonable risk of death, personal injury or property damage when the vehicle was put to its intended use and that the defect caused an accident or similar incident, such as a vehicle fire, which resulted in the loss or damage for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages. Vehicle defects can include shortcomings in the design of a vehicle, mistakes in the manufacturing of its component parts or in their assembly into a complete car or truck and failure to warn the purchaser or operator of a risk inherent in the use and operation of the vehicle. Manufacturers have a number of defenses available to them in seeking to prevent a plaintiff from succeeding in an automotive products liability action.

The most basic defense available to a manufacturer is the obvious one that the condition pointed to by the plaintiff either did not constitute a defect in the vehicle or that even if it did, it was not the cause of the injury or loss complained of. A manufacturer may attempt to establish a misuse defense, asserting that the operation or use of the vehicle was improper and need not have been anticipated by the manufacturer. (Some courts, however, will find that a certain degree of foreseeable misuse has to be taken into account by manufacturers, who are deemed to be aware of the types of conduct that drivers and passengers sometimes engage in.) Manufacturers will often seek to employ what is referred to as the seat belt defense, arguing that a vehicle occupant’s injuries were increased by his or her failure to make use of the available seat belts in the vehicle. Such a defense is likely to come into play when a jury is considering the comparative fault of the parties in the course of making decisions on liability and damages.

The law of products liability in the United States, including automotive products liability law, has evolved for more than half a century out of the separate legal systems of the individual states rather than out of a unified body of federal law. As a result, the legal standards governing the availability and employment of manufacturer defenses in automotive products liability cases will vary from state to state.

Copyright 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.

CONTACT US FOR A Free Consultation

NO PRESSURE. SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY. NO HIDDEN FEES.

Contact Form

or Call (414) 453-0800
Location &contact
MAIN OFFICE 933 N Mayfair Rd, Suite 300 MILWAUKEE, WI 53226
BY APPOINTMENT ONLY 500 West Silver Spring Dr, Suite K-200 GLENDALE, WI 53217
PHONE (414) 453-0800 FAX (414) 453-8282
Connect With Us
  • Facebook Icon
  • Twitter Icon
  • Youtube Icon
  • linked-in Icon
Request a free consultation Request a free consultation

NO PRESSURE. SPEAK TO AN ATTORNEY. NO HIDDEN FEES.

  • no pressure
  • no hidden fees

Contact popup Form

or Call (414) 453-0800